Impacts of Remote Work on Employee Productivity and Engagement

Authors

  • Leonardo Carvalho da Silva Instituto de Ensino Superior do Sul do Maranhão (lESMA/Unisulma), Brasil.
  • Jailza do Nascimento Tomaz Andrade Instituto de Ensino Superior do Sul do Maranhão (lESMA/Unisulma), Brasil. https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6146-2167

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.14295/idonline.v20i83.4499

Keywords:

Remote work, Productivity, Employee engagement, People management, Leadership

Abstract

In the field of people management, we analyzed the impacts of remote work on employee productivity and engagement, considering that its effects may vary according to the organizational, technological, social, and managerial conditions surrounding its implementation. We conducted a narrative literature review with a qualitative, exploratory, and descriptive approach, based on 23 scientific articles published between 2015 and 2024 and retrieved from Google Scholar and SciELO. We analyzed the studies through a thematic and comparative synthesis and organized the findings into five analytical axes: changes in work relations; productivity; engagement; management, leadership, and communication; and organizational challenges and opportunities. The results showed that autonomy, flexibility, reduced commuting, adequate infrastructure, clear objectives, and leadership support may enhance performance and engagement. Conversely, social isolation, work overload, communication difficulties, and blurred boundaries between personal and professional life may undermine these outcomes. We concluded that the effects of remote work are neither automatic nor uniform, as they depend on the interaction between the nature of the activities, employees’ individual conditions, and the organizations’ ability to plan, manage, and provide adequate support for remote work.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

Leonardo Carvalho da Silva , Instituto de Ensino Superior do Sul do Maranhão (lESMA/Unisulma), Brasil.

Acadêmico do curso de Bacharelado em Administração do Instituto de Ensino Superior do Sul do Maranhão – IESMA/Unisulma, Brasil.

Jailza do Nascimento Tomaz Andrade , Instituto de Ensino Superior do Sul do Maranhão (lESMA/Unisulma), Brasil.

Professora Orientadora. Administradora. Mestre em Planejamento e Desenvolvimento Regional. Pós-graduada em Gestão Empresarial. Pós-graduada em Metodologia do Ensino Superior.  Pós-graduada em Gestão de Pessoas e Desenvolvimento de Equipes. MBA em Gestão da Inovação. 

References

AGUIAR, S. F. B. de; OLIVEIRA, F. B. de; HRYNIEWICZ, L. G. C.; SANT’ANNA, A. de S. O teletrabalho e as mulheres: percepções da conciliação da vida profissional e familiar. Cadernos EBAPE.BR, v. 20, n. 6, p. 836-850, 2022. DOI: 10.1590/1679-395120210244.

ALLEN, T. D.; GOLDEN, T. D.; SHOCKLEY, K. M. How effective is telecommuting? Assessing the status of our scientific findings. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, v. 16, n. 2, p. 40-68, 2015. DOI: 10.1177/1529100615593273.

ARAÚJO, T. M. de; LUA, I. O trabalho mudou-se para casa: trabalho remoto no contexto da pandemia de COVID-19. Revista Brasileira de Saúde Ocupacional, v. 46, e27, 2021. DOI: 10.1590/2317-6369000030720.

BARBOSA FILHO, F. H.; VELOSO, F.; PERUCHETTI, P. H. Trabalho remoto no Brasil. Revista Brasileira de Economia, v. 76, n. 3, p. 349-378, 2022. DOI: 10.5935/0034-7140.20220015.

BELZUNEGUI-ERASO, A.; ERRO-GARCÉS, A. Teleworking in the context of the Covid-19 crisis. Sustainability, v. 12, n. 9, art. 3662, 2020. DOI: 10.3390/su12093662.

BENTLEY, T. A.; TEO, S. T. T.; MCLEOD, L.; TAN, F.; BOSUA, R.; GLOET, M. The role of organisational support in teleworker wellbeing: a socio-technical systems approach. Applied Ergonomics, v. 52, p. 207-215, 2016. DOI: 10.1016/j.apergo.2015.07.019.

BLOOM, N.; HAN, R.; LIANG, J. Hybrid working from home improves retention without damaging performance. Nature, v. 630, p. 920-925, 2024. DOI: 10.1038/s41586-024-07500-2.

BLOOM, N.; LIANG, J.; ROBERTS, J.; YING, Z. J. Does working from home work? Evidence from a Chinese experiment. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, v. 130, n. 1, p. 165-218, 2015. DOI: 10.1093/qje/qju032.

CHARALAMPOUS, M.; GRANT, C. A.; TRAMONTANO, C.; MICHAILIDIS, E. Systematically reviewing remote e-workers’ well-being at work: a multidimensional approach. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, v. 28, n. 1, p. 51-73, 2019. DOI: 10.1080/1359432X.2018.1541886.

CONTRERAS, F.; BAYKAL, E.; ABID, G. E-leadership and teleworking in times of COVID-19 and beyond: what we know and where do we go. Frontiers in Psychology, v. 11, art. 590271, 2020. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.590271.

DELANOEIJE, J.; VERBRUGGEN, M. Between-person and within-person effects of telework: a quasi-field experiment. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, v. 29, n. 6, p. 795-808, 2020. DOI: 10.1080/1359432X.2020.1774557.

DURÃES, B.; BRIDI, M. A. da C.; DUTRA, R. Q. O teletrabalho na pandemia da covid-19: uma nova armadilha do capital? Sociedade e Estado, v. 36, n. 3, p. 945-966, 2021. DOI: 10.1590/s0102-6992-202136030005.

FILARDI, F.; CASTRO, R. M. P. de; ZANINI, M. T. F. Vantagens e desvantagens do teletrabalho na administração pública: análise das experiências do Serpro e da Receita Federal. Cadernos EBAPE.BR, v. 18, n. 1, p. 28-46, 2020. DOI: 10.1590/1679-395174605.

GALANTI, T.; GUIDETTI, G.; MAZZEI, E.; ZAPPALÀ, S.; TOSCANO, F. Work from home during the COVID-19 outbreak: the impact on employees’ remote work productivity, engagement, and stress. Journal of Occupational and Environmental Medicine, v. 63, n. 7, p. e426-e432, 2021. DOI: 10.1097/JOM.0000000000002236.

IPSEN, C.; VAN VELDHOVEN, M.; KIRCHNER, K.; HANSEN, J. P. Six key advantages and disadvantages of working from home in Europe during COVID-19. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, v. 18, n. 4, art. 1826, 2021. DOI: 10.3390/ijerph18041826.

KNIFFIN, K. M. et al. COVID-19 and the workplace: implications, issues, and insights for future research and action. American Psychologist, v. 76, n. 1, p. 63-77, 2021. DOI: 10.1037/amp0000716.

LUNDQVIST, D.; WALLO, A. Leadership and employee well-being and work performance when working from home: a systematic literature review. Scandinavian Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, v. 8, n. 1, art. 9, 2023. DOI: 10.16993/sjwop.199.

MÄKIKANGAS, A.; JUUTINEN, S.; MÄKINIEMI, J.-P.; SJÖBLOM, K.; OKSANEN, A. Work engagement and its antecedents in remote work: a person-centered view. Work & Stress, v. 36, n. 4, p. 392-416, 2022. DOI: 10.1080/02678373.2022.2080777.

NAKROŠIENĖ, A.; BUČIŪNIENĖ, I.; GOŠTAUTAITĖ, B. Working from home: characteristics and outcomes of telework. International Journal of Manpower, v. 40, n. 1, p. 87-101, 2019. DOI: 10.1108/IJM-07-2017-0172.

ROCHA, C. T. M.; AMADOR, F. S. O teletrabalho: conceituação e questões para análise. Cadernos EBAPE.BR, v. 16, n. 1, p. 152-162, 2018. DOI: 10.1590/1679-395154516.

TOSCANO, F.; ZAPPALÀ, S. Social isolation and stress as predictors of productivity perception and remote work satisfaction during the COVID-19 pandemic: the role of concern about the virus in a moderated double mediation. Sustainability, v. 12, n. 23, art. 9804, 2020. DOI: 10.3390/su12239804.

WANG, B.; LIU, Y.; QIAN, J.; PARKER, S. K. Achieving effective remote working during the COVID-19 pandemic: a work design perspective. Applied Psychology, v. 70, n. 1, p. 16-59, 2021. DOI: 10.1111/apps.12290.

YANG, L. et al. The effects of remote work on collaboration among information workers. Nature Human Behaviour, v. 6, n. 1, p. 43-54, 2022. DOI: 10.1038/s41562-021-01196-4.

Published

2026-09-25

How to Cite

Silva , L. C. da, & Andrade , J. do N. T. (2026). Impacts of Remote Work on Employee Productivity and Engagement . ID on Line. Revista De Psicologia, 20(83), 126–146. https://doi.org/10.14295/idonline.v20i83.4499

Issue

Section

Artigo de Revisão